Paddy Pimblett's Take on Arman Tsarukyan's UFC Journey
In a recent interview, Paddy Pimblett, the rising star of the UFC, shared his thoughts on the controversial decision to exclude Arman Tsarukyan from the title picture. Pimblett's comments have sparked a heated debate among fans and experts alike.
The Title Picture Debate
As of January 6, 2026, the UFC lightweight division was in a state of flux. With champion Ilia Topuria taking personal time off due to legal issues, the promotion had to decide on an interim title fight. Many believed Tsarukyan, ranked No. 1, deserved a shot, but the UFC opted for Pimblett vs. Justin Gaethje at UFC 324.
Pimblett's Perspective
Pimblett, known for his bold and outspoken nature, disagreed with the notion that Tsarukyan was snubbed. He highlighted Tsarukyan's decision to decline a fight against Mateusz Gamrot and instead choose a seemingly easier opponent, Dan Hooker. Pimblett argued that Tsarukyan's grappling skills were exposed in that fight, and he questioned Tsarukyan's ability to handle his own style.
"He nearly guillotined Hooker, which shows how weak his grappling is. I'd put him in a guillotine, and he'd be out cold."
Pimblett also took issue with Tsarukyan's criticism of his own opponents. Tsarukyan had beaten Beneil Dariush, but Pimblett pointed out that Dariush was past his prime. He also expressed doubts about Tsarukyan's victory over Charles Oliveira, stating that many, including himself, believed Oliveira won that fight.
The Interim Title Shot
Pimblett earned his title shot after a dominant performance against former title challenger Michael Chandler at UFC 314. He was the frontrunner to face Topuria until the champion's personal issues arose. Pimblett's path to the interim title is a testament to his skill and popularity, but it also raises questions about the UFC's decision-making process.
Controversy and Counterpoints
Here's where it gets interesting: Pimblett's comments have divided the MMA community. Some agree with his assessment of Tsarukyan's skills, while others believe Tsarukyan deserved a shot at the title. What do you think? Is Pimblett being too harsh, or is he simply stating the truth? The UFC's decisions often spark debates, and this is no exception.
Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments! Let's discuss and explore different perspectives on this intriguing topic.
